Type to search the archive.

Issue No. 11

The forty people who opened nothing

Every list has a dormant third. Most advice says to win them back. The arithmetic says to let them go, and to do it on purpose.

Crytek2 min read

Redemption
Post Score: 0
This post
Current total
Crytek current total score: 1000
A gradient running from red and orange into green
Photograph by Codioful

Pull up your list and filter for addresses with no opens in twelve months. For most newsletters past their second year, it is somewhere between a quarter and a half.

The standard advice is a win-back sequence: four emails with increasingly plaintive subject lines, ending in “is this goodbye?”. I have run those. They convert around two percent, and the two percent were mostly going to open the next issue anyway.

Here is the case for the other approach.

What a dormant subscriber costs

They cost you money. Every provider prices on list size. A thousand dormant addresses on a typical plan is real money a year, spent on people who are not reading.

They cost you deliverability. This is the expensive one. Mailbox providers score you on how recipients behave. A third of your sends landing on addresses that never open is a third of your sends saying “this mail is unwanted”. That score is applied to everyone, including the readers who love you.

They cost you clarity. An open rate calculated against a list that is a third dead is a number you cannot use. Every decision you make from it is made through a fog.

What removing them actually did

I suppressed 1,340 addresses from a list of 4,200 in February. Nobody was deleted — suppressed, so the records exist and anyone who comes back is recognised.

  • Open rate went from 28% to 44%. Same readers, honest denominator.
  • Inbox placement in Gmail improved measurably; Promotions-tab share dropped by about a third.
  • Provider bill dropped by 40 a month.
  • Six people noticed and re-subscribed.

The list looked smaller on the dashboard and more people read the newsletter. Both of those were true at once, and only one of them mattered.

A subscriber count is a vanity number the moment it stops tracking readers. The point at which that happens is earlier than anyone wants to believe.

How to do it without being dramatic

Define dormant honestly. No opens and no clicks in twelve months, for addresses that have received at least ten issues. A signup from three weeks ago is not dormant, it is new.

Send one email. One. Subject: “Still want this?” Body: three sentences and two links — keep it, or stop. No countdown, no guilt, no “we’ll miss you”. The four-email sequence exists to squeeze the two percent, and the squeezing is what makes people resent you.

Suppress, do not delete. Keep the record so you can tell a returning subscriber from a new one, and so you never mail them again by accident.

Do it once a year. On a date, in the calendar. It is hygiene, not a campaign.

The part that is uncomfortable

You will watch a number you have spent years growing go down by a third in an afternoon. If you have ever quoted that number to a sponsor or on a pitch, it will feel like a loss.

It is not. It is the difference between the audience you have and the audience you report. Only one of those replies to you.

Next issue: the arithmetic behind a paid tier, run before you spend three months building one.

Share this post

The forty people who opened nothing

Discussion

Your take belongs here. Keep it thoughtful.

Community

Powered by Giscus · Sign in with GitHub to join in.

All posts